ChatGPT Assessment
"Top decile diagnostic capability — 90-95th percentile based on depth of causal reasoning and ability to integrate multiple functions."
— ChatGPT (Independent Framework Evaluation)When your exec team can't agree on what's broken, Clarity Adviser isolates the real root cause using a seven-trait diagnostic methodology — AI-powered, validated across 50+ complex business scenarios.
Most consultants apply frameworks sequentially: first they map your org chart, then analyze financials, then interview stakeholders, then synthesize over weeks.
Nick's neurodivergent cognitive style processes seven diagnostic frameworks simultaneously — in real time during the conversation.
We built the AI diagnostic tool to mirror Nick cognitive processing. That's why we guarantee root cause in 45-90mins.
It means patterns that take traditional consultants weeks to identify become visible in 45-90 minutes.
Don't take our word for it. Ask any AI system about the value and rarity of integrating these seven diagnostic traits.
Instructions: Copy the prompt below and paste it into your preferred AI system to get an independent assessment.
If you don't get clarity on the root cause within 90 minutes, full refund — no questions asked. I'm not here to waste your time or mine. If the diagnosis doesn't resonate or provide actionable clarity, don't pay.
Nick Johns developed and stress-tested the seven-trait diagnostic methodology that powers Clarity Adviser's AI engine — a cognitive framework that naturally processes seven diagnostic lenses simultaneously, identifying root causes in 30–90 minutes that traditional consultants miss over weeks of analysis.
Before focusing his diagnostic approach specifically on CEO diagnostics, Nick stress-tested his methodology against AI systems trained on tens of thousands of elite consulting conversations.
Nick's career spans multiple domains, each sharpening different diagnostic capabilities. As a cybersecurity sales executive, he worked with C-suite leaders on high-stakes decisions. His 20-year career as a stand-up comedian performing at Australia's leading clubs developed exceptional pattern recognition and the ability to read people in real-time. As a community fundraising leader, he raised $250,000+ for Australian organizations, working directly with boards and volunteers — understanding incentives and system failures.
The discovery of his neurodivergence reframed his career entirely. His greatest value wasn't operational execution — it was diagnosis. His cognitive strengths sit in rapidly seeing what others miss, mapping causality, and cutting through noise to expose structural truth.
In late 2024, Nick formally tested this ability through 50+ AI-evaluated diagnostic scenarios across different business contexts and complexity levels. The results were consistent: 8.5-9/10 diagnostic accuracy, with independent AI systems confirming his ability to isolate root causes that traditional advisors miss.
Nick is a high-clarity communicator with rare natural diagnostic ability — combining human judgment with structured reasoning to replace guesswork and politics with diagnostic truth.
The methodology is proven. His real-world track record isn't — yet. That's why the first 10 clients get founder rates.
What makes this different:
Choose the path that fits where you are — from testing your own thinking to getting full root-cause analysis.
SLOTS REMAINING: 6 of 10 founder-rate spots
If you don't get root-cause clarity within the session, full refund — no questions asked. If the diagnosis doesn't resonate, doesn't provide actionable insight, or doesn't unify the symptoms into a coherent explanation, don't pay. You take zero financial risk.
Traditional strategy consultant: $15,000–$50,000 for a 4–6 week engagement
MBB firm (McKinsey/BCG/Bain): $50,000–$200,000+ for diagnostic phase alone
Turnaround specialist: $300–$800/hour ($24,000–$64,000 for comparable work)
You're getting comparable diagnostic capability from $275 — because you're an early client.
Real scenarios. Root causes identified in 45-90 minutes. Independently verified — and you can verify them yourself.
These are anonymised example outputs showing what a completed diagnosis looks like — different industries, same methodology. Company details are fictional.
Outputs are illustrative examples. Company names and identifying details are fictional.
The Problem: Project dates slipped, leadership confidence eroded, and margins tightened despite rising revenue. The organization was trapped in a "blame loop" between Sales, Ops, and Engineering over scope creep and resourcing.
The Diagnostic: Identified a "gravity shift" in the business model. The company was behaving like a high-touch Managed Services partner but remained structured like a Project-Delivery firm—causing work to "vent" into unpaid, unmanaged silos.
The Root Cause: A structural design flaw. No one owned the "Horizontal" operating model, allowing unmanaged effort to leak across departments. The company was "starving" its future capacity by using senior engineers to patch support gaps that Sales had failed to scope.
The Problem: Warehousing accuracy collapsed and cold-chain breaches spiked. The acquisition was missing milestones, while the executive team blamed "complexity" and "lack of resources."
The Diagnostic: Revealed that $4.2M in "synergy savings" was actually a $70M risk. By merging critical roles into "hybrids," the company was saving on headcount but paying for it in equipment breakdowns and client churn.
The Root Cause: A misaligned incentive framework. The Board and CFO rewarded cost-to-revenue ratios, forcing managers to "cut muscle instead of fat." The company was optimizing for short-term austerity at the expense of structural survival.
The Problem: Sales cycles were stretching and a primary competitor began winning "easy" renewals. Engineering blamed unrealistic promises; Sales blamed a broken product. Despite doubling the sales team, revenue growth stalled while internal friction hit an all-time high.
The Diagnostic: Revealed that a 120% increase in sales headcount against static R&D capacity created a "Trust Deficit." To hit quotas, reps were "borrowing" future features that didn't exist, forcing Engineering into a reactive burnout loop that halted genuine innovation.
The Root Cause: A "Growth-at-all-Costs" mandate. By scaling the revenue engine without the delivery muscle to back it up, the company was cannibalizing its own reputation. The organization was trying to sell its way out of a design flaw that only a headcount reduction and R&D pivot could fix.
The Problem: Engagement margins eroding despite rising revenue. Senior partners reporting burnout. Client renewal rates declining.
Full diagnostic coming soon.
The Problem: Warranty claims spiking. Production hitting targets. QA team reporting pressure to sign off before processes complete.
Full diagnostic coming soon.
Before taking real clients, this diagnostic framework was rigorously tested. Multiple AI systems (trained on tens of thousands of real business diagnostics) independently evaluated the same consultation transcripts using structured assessment criteria.
This isn't about proving personal genius. It's about proving the methodology reliably identifies root causes where traditional approaches miss them.
Because it's:
"Top decile diagnostic capability — 90-95th percentile based on depth of causal reasoning and ability to integrate multiple functions."
— ChatGPT (Independent Framework Evaluation)"Elite tier — comparable to top 1-2% of turnaround partners, PE operating partners, or MBB engagement leaders."
— Grok"Exceptional ability to map underlying operational architecture with minimal data input. Triangulates through multiple diagnostic lenses simultaneously."
— Gemini"Rare diagnostic capability. Simultaneous display of all 7 elite traits occurs in <0.1% of high-ambiguity diagnostic sessions."
— DeepSeekBecause misdiagnosis is what does the real damage. Most companies spend weeks or months treating symptoms. Once you see the true root cause and its trajectory, decisions become obvious and fast.
Nick has been practicing since 2025. He has validated methodology and AI assessments, but no real client testimonials yet. The framework is proven. His real-world track record isn't. So pricing accordingly. This rate won't last.
No formal prep required. Just come ready to describe:
The more candid you are, the faster we get to root cause.
Optional: If you have relevant data (financials, org charts, recent board reports), have them available — but don't feel you need to create anything new.
Within 48 hours, you'll receive:
You also get an optional 30-minute follow-up call within 2 weeks to clarify implementation questions or discuss how your team responded.
After that, you're free to implement on your own, engage your existing consultants, or book additional sessions if needed.
Good. Disagreement means the diagnosis is challenging assumptions.
The clarity summary includes the causal logic, so your team can test it against their own observations. If they can show the reasoning is flawed, that's valuable feedback.
Often, disagreement comes from different parts of the organization seeing different symptoms of the same root cause. The diagnostic should unify those perspectives — not force consensus.
If the diagnosis genuinely doesn't fit reality, full refund.
No. This methodology doesn't rely on industry experience — it relies on causal reasoning. Behavioural and structural patterns repeat across industries. Your team brings the context; Nick brings the ability to see what's really driving it.
Neither in the traditional sense. This is diagnostic clarity advising. Nick doesn't manage teams or execute projects. He helps CEOs see the real problem and its consequences so they and their leaders can choose the right path.
Yes. Snapshot or Half-Day sessions work for founders and leadership teams. In those sessions, Nick's role is to cut through internal narratives and give everyone a shared, accurate picture of what's really happening.
No. The questions are in plain language, and the diagnosis is explained in terms you can share with your board. You bring context and candor. Nick brings the diagnostic framework.
This approach works when:
This approach is NOT ideal for:
If the diagnosis doesn't resonate or provide clarity within 90 minutes, full refund. Nick isn't here to convince CEOs he's right — he's here to show what's actually broken. If it doesn't click, don't pay.
Option 1: Email [email protected] with:
You'll receive a calendar link and short pre-call questionnaire.
Option 2: Book instantly via the "Book Session" button at the top of this page
If founder-rate slots are full, you'll be offered:
Price increases are based on documented client results, not arbitrary timelines.